ignore me, i should have fully read the email. i was thinking java. Dennis
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:43:05 -0500 Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:22:52 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:34:16 +0100 > > Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Orion asked this a while ago, but no answer was forthcoming. > > > What's the right way to fix the problem outlined below (arising > > > as there's no 32 bit java on x86_64) ... > > > > Sadly, I think we need a fix in mash to get epel to not multiarch > > some things. > > > > See https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4130 > > > > and hope we can find someone willing to work on mash to make this > > happen. > > mash will exclude a noarch package that has a ExcludeArch from the > repo for the arch so for rhel 5 you need to "ExcludeArch: ppc" and > rhel 6 "ExcludeArch: ppc64" > > Dennis > > > > Thanks, > > > Jonathan. > > > > kevin > > -- > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: <build...@fedoraproject.org> > > > Date: 7 April 2013 05:25 > > > Subject: Broken dependencies: vtk > > > To: vtk-ow...@fedoraproject.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vtk has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: > > > On x86_64: > > > vtk-java-5.8.0-6.el6.1.i686 requires > > > libjawt.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) Please resolve this as soon as > > > possible. > > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
