On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 12:03:47 +0100 Karel Volný <kvo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi, > > Dne pátek, 13. prosince 2013 17:42:24 CEST, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:36:48 -0700 > > "T.C. Hollingsworth" <tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > >> Yeah, opt-in sounds like a much better idea. :-) > > > > Yeah, it does mean slower, but I think it's good to only have those > > things in that are for sure maintained. > > -1 from me, if I get you right that everyone should ack the packages > to be branched > > I often don't find enough time for the things I'm not paid for, so I > see a potential to miss some "please add your package if you want to > have it in EPEL7" plea But by our own policies someone who submits such a plea only has to wait a week and if you don't answer, they can branch and maintain. A active involved maintainer seems like a win there over "oh, I'll fire off a build and hope it works and won't have time to look at any bugs" > but that doesn't mean I'd call these things "unmaintained", just the > response times are a bit longer ... Sure, we are all busy. ;) Thats just a good chance to bring in a co-maintainer that does have more time, etc. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
