On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:03:05 -0700 Jeff Sheltren <j...@tag1consulting.com> wrote:
> According to the initial agreement among interested parties, EPSCO was > going to end the first term on March 31st, 2015. Yeah. At the meeting after that point I think everyone agreed to just keep on going? Perhaps there was no formal setup shown. > With that in mind, what's the status of the policy questions outlined > here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-faster-repo-ideas What > remains to be done from the policies and tasks outlined there and in > the first few EPSCO meetings? IMHO, it needs people to drive it. Come up with ideas/plan, present that plan and get buy in from everyone or adjust it as much as can be done to get consensus and then help implement it. TANSTASFL. > And has there been any discussion of new committee members and/or what > term-lengths may be in the future? I haven't seen anything on that > topic discussed on this list. Yeah, it was in meeting I think. IMHO, I don't find voting or set term limits that helpfull. I'd prefer a meritocracy where people who show up and do work are given more power to do things. > Additionally, are meetings still happening regularly? From what I've > seen, they seem to be cancelled more often than they take place. I'd defer that question to Smooge as he was running the meetings. I think there was a good deal of people traveling, etc... I do think regular meetings are good, as they are a way for people to see who is doing what and contibute. kevin
pgpWlul74SkaS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
