On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> "DJ" == Dave Johansen <[email protected]> writes: > > DJ> Is there anything that could be done in EPEL to make the Python 3 > DJ> macros be usable without requiring %{python3_pkgversion}? > > Well, there has been some on and off work focused on making python > packaging less hideous. A spec would look sort of like this: > > https://pagure.io/python-macros/blob/master/f/test1.spec > > And I think that would work down into EPEL. > Good to hear that progress is being made. > But otherwise, there's not much we can do about that _pkgversion macro, > since EPEL may even get multiple python versions at some point. The > fancy macros actually handle that, but they aren't really a thing you > could use right now. > For the time being, could the python34 package add a Provides for python3 so the _pkgversion macro isn't necessary?
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
