On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:50 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello list, > > I've built an environment-modules based gcc-5.3.1 for RHEL6 that lives > side-by-side with vendor packages - it installs to /opt/ and has a > name{version} scheme to avoid conflicts, which I'd like to include in EPEL6. > > In accordance with the guidelines > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Still_unsure_if_a_package_is_fine_for_EPEL.3F) > I'm asking here if this is appropriate or, if not, how can I modify it so > gcc-5 can make it into EPEL. > > I can provide a working srpm for both binutils2.26 and gcc5.3.1 (the binutils > is required, and also builds to /opt and enabled via modules).
This sounds very much like a software collection (SCL) and I don't believe we have a agreed policy on how that is done for EPEL (see list archives) _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
