On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:38 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 22. 04. 22 19:53, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in > epel9 > > Koji, but not in mock. > > > > At the end, I compared the list of packages with: > > > > $ koji list-buildroot 34845388 | sort > koji > > $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 shell -- rpm -qa | sort > mock > > $ diff -u koji mock | grep -v ' ' > > +acl-2.3.1-3.el9.x86_64 > > -audit-libs-3.0.7-101.el9.x86_64 > > ... > > > > This seems like my local mock has newer c9s packages than the Koji build > repo. > > Is that expected, or is pulling c9s packages into the build repo stuck > on Koji > > side? > > > > Actually, I got an idea that EPEL 9 Koji might already be using > (internal?) > > RHEL 9.0, possibly I have missed this switch... However, the > > centos-stream-release package contraditcs taht idea :/ > > > > I've checked with an EPEL 9 Next Koji scratchbuild and it got e.g. > > pyproject-rpm-macros-1.0.1-1.el9. > > > Thanks for all the answers -- I see them in the archives but never > received them :( > > Was this "freeze" ever announced somewhere? I might have missed that as > well, > considering I am clearly missing some email. > I know in the weekly council meeting it was announced. But now that I go through my emails I see that we announced we were going to do it, but we never actually sent out an email saying that the change had happened. Sorry about that. Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
