Am 10.05.23 um 05:24 schrieb Maxwell G:
Hello EPEL users and developers,
RHEL 9.2 was released today,
so I have updated ansible in EPEL 9 from 6.3.0 to 7.2.0 to match RHEL
9.2's ansible-core bump from 2.13.3 to 2.14.2.
Each ansible major version is tied to a specific major version of
ansible-core, and we keep them in sync.
Along with this change, RHEL 9.2 builds ansible-core for the python3.11
stack instead of the default python3 (3.9) stack.
Therefore, ansible in EPEL now built for python3.11 as well.
Here is the Bodhi update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f51a0ff8a1
Please help test and give karma.
Until this update is pushed to stable, you may receive an error like
this when running dnf upgrade
```
Error:
Problem: package ansible-6.3.0-2.el9.noarch requires python3.9dist(ansible-core)
>= 2.13.3, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both ansible-core-2.14.2-4.el9.x86_64 and
ansible-core-2.13.3-2.el9_1.x86_64
- cannot install both ansible-core-2.14.2-4.el9.x86_64 and
ansible-core-2.13.3-1.el9.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
ansible-core-2.13.3-2.el9_1.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
ansible-6.3.0-2.el9.noarch
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or
'--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only
best candidate packages)
```
There are a couple potential solutions:
1. Run
$ dnf upgrade --exclude ansible-core
to skip ansible-core and upgrade everything else.
2. In a couple hours from from now (now is 3:15 UTC), you'll be able to install
ansible 7.2.0 from testing with
$ dnf upgrade --refresh --enablerepo=epel-testing ansible ansible-core
and then run a plain `dnf upgrade` as usual.
While setting up a new workstation with an EL rebuild, I run into the
situation that ansible is not installable (rocky still on 9.1). Is there
a change from EPEL side to close this time gap by at least keep older
packages (current-1) on the repos? Like epel-next closes the "forward"
gap, this would close such "backward" gap, thought ...
--
Leon
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
