Am 15.05.23 um 20:50 schrieb Jonathan Wright:
EPEL tracks RHEL, not clones.
EPEL10 is likely to resolve this, however. Ref
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal
<https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal>
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:31 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel
...
While setting up a new workstation with an EL rebuild, I run into the
situation that ansible is not installable (rocky still on 9.1). Is there
a chance from EPEL side to close this time gap by at least keep older
packages (current-1) on the repos? Like epel-next closes the "forward"
gap, this would close such "backward" gap, thought ...
--
Leon
Well, my point was not a strategy change, more a technical variation
that eliminates a lot of cases (also the above mentioned). Without
a single downgrade path, regressions can not be addressed. Just an
example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184351
So, it was a general feasibility request. For those that slip into
such situation; there are still the repo archives, that get a copy
when a minor release happens (this one I had forgotten).
--
Leon
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
