No, it was just not in scope, yet. Any suggestions are very welcome. In SPEM 2.0 we modeled Metrics as Describable Elements (i.e. documentation) that also own a list of formal UML Infrastructure Value Specifications, which is what we currently planning of implementing.
Thanks and best regards, Peter Haumer. ______________________________________________________________ PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat. Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework Rational Software | IBM Software Group Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096 ______________________________________________________________ "Pamio, Diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/24/2007 19:09 Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> To "Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <[email protected]> cc Subject [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics Did anyone tried to model process & product metrics method elements with EPF? How is the best way to do it? I know this seems just not to be an [epf-?DEV?] question, but mi concern is that the ?metrics? world has been considered or just that when designing the epf-composer, a better solution to handle the metrics problematic was found, like, for instance, a combination of tasks, guidelines, terms definitions, roles and workproducts (that is, roles for metrics collection and reporting responsibles, guidelines for metrics computation, terms definitions for formulae, workproducts for source data and tasks to glue everything). Which are your experiences on the topic? Regards, Diego N. Pamio asdc Argentina Software Development Center Intel Software de Arg. ++54 351 414 5571 _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
