I am too. We are using EPFC for a research project on capability ( or System of Systems) engineering methodology.
We "translated" our existing metho. documentation inside EPF C ( approx 10 roles, 50~ tasks, 5 deliverables and 70~ workproducts.) Another goal of the project is to implement "Pattern process" to provide agility within the methodology. We might have to extend the "capability pattern" feature of EPF-C. and make some development to validate our hypothesis. Cordially, Christophe Nécaille. -- Christophe Nécaille, Ph.D. Section Systèmes de systèmes | Systems of systems section Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada Valcartier | Defence Research and Development Canada Valcartier Ministère de la Défense nationale | Department of National Defence 2459 boul. Pie XI nord | 2459 Pie XI North Blvd Québec, Qc. G3J 1X5 courriel | email : christophe.necai...@drdc-rddc.gc.ca Telephone | phone : 418-844-4000, x4490 Télécopieur | Facsimile : 418-844-4538 Téléimprimeur (Défense nationale) | Teletypewriter (National Defence) 1-800-467-9877 Gouvernement du Canada | Government of Canada Le lundi 10 août 2009 à 10:02 +0800, Naz'ri a écrit : > Hi, > > > I am one of them. Developing a description for evaluation framework > using EPFC 1.5 > > > - 3 roles > - 6 tasks > - 10 work products > - many examples > > > Best wishes, > > > Naz'ri > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > From: Jim Ruehlin <jrueh...@us.ibm.com> > To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List > <epf-dev@eclipse.org> > Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 2:22:54 > Subject: [epf-dev] Query: Who is Building Stand-alone EPF Content? > > > > Hello, > > I'm interested in finding out how many people are creating content > using EPF Composer, but are not using the EPF Practice Library. Or, > you're just using the EPF Practice Library for a minority of the > content you publish. It would be useful to understand how many > organizations are creating a (comparatively) large amount of content > as opposed to creating small extensions to existing practices. > > I'd appreciate it if you could respond to the newsgroup or to me > personally if you prefer with a quick note letting me know > approximately how many pages/elements you're creating, and the nature > of the project (large enterprise content deployment, content that > covers specialized areas, etc). > > This is useful for the EPF community to know as people want to provide > services or training around the way the tool and content is actually > being used. > > Much thanks, > Jim Ruehlin, EPF Committer > > Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational Software > Method Architect, ADC CoP > RMC SIG Lead > jrueh...@us.ibm.com > voice: 949.545.8912 > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > New Email names for you! > Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and > @rocketmail. > Hurry before someone else does! > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > epf-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
