Hi Jim, we created our company process model with EPFC. this mean that we described processes not just for SW development, but for whole organisation. Concerning role of OpenUP ... this is a nice inspiration, but as probably all organisations we have to make tailoring and we found that is better to set up new Method Library with our own content.
yours sincerely, JAN MASARYK Director of Coordination & Strategy Support Asseco Central Europe Contact Information: Asseco Slovakia, a.s. Trenčianska 56/A, 821 09 Bratislava Slovak Republic Phone: + 421-2-20 838 537 e-mail: jan.masa...@asseco.sk<mailto:jan.masa...@asseco.sk> www.asseco.sk From: epf-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:epf-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Jim Ruehlin Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:23 PM To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List Subject: [epf-dev] Query: Who is Building Stand-alone EPF Content? Hello, I'm interested in finding out how many people are creating content using EPF Composer, but are not using the EPF Practice Library. Or, you're just using the EPF Practice Library for a minority of the content you publish. It would be useful to understand how many organizations are creating a (comparatively) large amount of content as opposed to creating small extensions to existing practices. I'd appreciate it if you could respond to the newsgroup or to me personally if you prefer with a quick note letting me know approximately how many pages/elements you're creating, and the nature of the project (large enterprise content deployment, content that covers specialized areas, etc). This is useful for the EPF community to know as people want to provide services or training around the way the tool and content is actually being used. Much thanks, Jim Ruehlin, EPF Committer Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational Software Method Architect, ADC CoP RMC SIG Lead jrueh...@us.ibm.com voice: 949.545.8912
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
