On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 22:43 -0400, Adam Hooper wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 20:21 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 00:43 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > But, it seems to be excessively chatty, by which I mean it insists on > > > > loading pages from the network that I *KNOW* should be cached. Browsing > > > > from the cache seems impossible - as soon as you go into offline mode, > > > > every page says it's not available. > > > That's no solution, it's a workaround. I'm a programmer, I'd rather > > find the problem and fix it. What's the point of having a cache in > > epiphany at all if it's not working? Might as well rip out that code. > > Does Firefox behave the same way? >
AFAICT, Firefox does not have the problem. My test was to load the Drudge Report main page (Richard M Nixon unavailable for comment ;-), then after all the pictures loaded, hit "Reload", and verify that it does not re-download each image from the server. Whereas with Epiphany, on the same site, I am certain that in the past, I have opened the site, let the main image load, browsed elsewhere, and when I returned half an hour or so later, it reloaded the same image from the server. It's easy to tell on dialup, because images load line-by-line. Lee _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
