On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 22:43 -0400, Adam Hooper wrote: > On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 20:21 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 00:43 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > But, it seems to be excessively chatty, by which I mean it insists on > > > > loading pages from the network that I *KNOW* should be cached. Browsing > > > > from the cache seems impossible - as soon as you go into offline mode, > > > > every page says it's not available. > > > That's no solution, it's a workaround. I'm a programmer, I'd rather > > find the problem and fix it. What's the point of having a cache in > > epiphany at all if it's not working? Might as well rip out that code. > > Does Firefox behave the same way? >
Sorry, disregard the last message. I spoke too soon. Firefox *does* automatically reload the same images from the server. It seems that if the site specifies a 5-minute refresh, as this one does, Firefox and Epiphany will do what it says and reload *everything* every 5 minutes. Maybe this is the "correct" behavior. But, IE is MUCH more aggressive about caching images which is good from the user POV. Lee _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
