El dom, 04-10-2015 a las 01:53 -0300, Bastián Díaz escribió: > As you know, websites are dynamic and sometimes execute processes > that > closing the web browser, allow data loss. A warning helps prevent > accidental errors. Moreover, you are right, I think it also greatly > influences the workflow imposed by other web browsers.
Ah, well normally I would say the site is broken in that case, but most of these sites probably work properly in other browsers. This is usually our fault: see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722032 and https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139090 I don't think we can have the warning you request, since it conflicts badly with restored session state: you would get the warning every time you close your browser unless you close all tabs first (something I never do; I don't think I'm atypical). > Is that really so?. For years I use fedora and perform clean > installations. I remember in F22 to install the plugin manually, like > F23 beta testing(gnome). > However, my point is the low visibility of the plugin in gnome > -software > (easiest method of package management for new users). The only > visible > plugin (recommended?) Is the Java plugin (iced-tea). Is this a > appdata > issue on epiphany or evince? How do you install Fedora? If you're installing Fedora Workstation with the advertised live image, it's included by default since F22: https:// git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/commit/?id=c02af66820aa5dfb36e4324f 525eabbb5e9f71b9 There are other ways to install Fedora though, which don't get you to the same result.... > For other issues, is not a nuisance to write reports for > improvement?. > - Pin Epiphany tabs > - Reading view > - Webextensión API You can file one for reading view, just please mark it as Enhancement level severity. See also: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735050 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730029 (which I renamed just now) > I also noticed that there is some suspicion in the incorporation of > new > icons (functions) in the headerbar. Therefore, does the possibility > of a > button is out to "add bookmarks"? Well, I don't want peripherally-related features to show up there. Firefox has Pocket and Smile up there now, and if you install extensions you might have AdBlock Plus, Privacy Badger, HTTPS Everywhere, color icons that look completely out of place... sure Firefox lets you remove the buttons, but it's a bad user experience and I think I'd rather have extensions that think they're getting a button simply get a menu item instead. So yeah, we have a high standard for adding stuff to the header bar. But an add bookmark button is frequently-requested core functionality; that passes the test IMO. Firefox has done that quite well so something similar to theirs would be welcome. > , O include a progress bar similar to > the new file progress operations from nautilus? Not sure quite what you mean. I like the subtle progress bar we have right now, if you're talking about page loads. Michael _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
