Whatever social science may prattle and whatever the 
merits of technology, I simply wrote a proof that Goedel's
Theorem is the unsurpassed summit of idiocy ever committed
in pseudo-science. A point, that's all. Did you read it?
Georges.


--- On Tue, 8/26/08, archytas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We might say "logic smodgik" in respect of a lot
> of academic work.  In
> social science Godel was hailed as somehow allowing
> intution at the
> expense of hard work - strangely lots of brain dumps of
> twaddle
> lacking intuition followed.  I quite like the idea of
> reliable
> software doing work that would otherwise consume lifetimes,
> much as I
> welcome technology in farming to save broken backs - yet
> there is a
> price to pay if this is just to doom us to fat idleness and
> idle
> criminality or the inanities of single Gaussian copula
> based super-
> computing to keep an idle rich or consume us in Dr.
> Strangelove's
> Game.  We do not pay enough attention to what logic becomes
> once it is
> playing a part in practical matters, and when idiots render
> it
> unquestionable.
> 
> On 26 Aug, 09:17, Georges Metanomski
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- On Tue, 8/26/08, archytas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd take a different tack on Godel. ...
> >
> > ===============
> > Before taking it have a look at
> > " LIAR'S PARADOX"
> inhttp://findgeorges.com/ROOT/RELATIVISTIC_DIALECTIC/C_MODELING_AND_LOG...
> > which clearly shows that of all cortege following  
> > Russell's fatuous "logic" Goedel was the
> most asinine,
> > not worth while losing a minute to tackle with.
> > Georges.
> >
> > ===================
> 

      

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to