epistemology  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [epistemology 13374] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13374] Book: Quantum Enigma, Sadovnik Socratus
• Re: [epistemology 13372] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13372] Gravity - GRT and the Big Bang Sadovnik Socratus
• [epistemology 13371] Can the CERN-LHC project explain quantum particles ''all the way down''? Sadovnik Socratus
• [epistemology 13370] A Theory of Quantum Mechanics That Suggests Everyone is Immortal Sadovnik Socratus
• [epistemology 13369] Quantum physics: From Planck to Sadhguru Sadovnik Socratus
• [epistemology 13368] The strange link between the human mind and quantum physics Sadovnik Socratus
• [epistemology 13367] Black Holes -- Problem and Solution. Sadovnik Socratus
• [epistemology 13366] Physics Needs Philosophy / Philosophy Needs Physics Sadovnik Socratus
• Re: [epistemology 13364] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13364] Dark matter and Dark energy are basis for Quantum Gravity. Sadovnik Socratus
• Re: [epistemology 13362] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13362] Gravity: Spinning Galaxies and Dark Matter Sadovnik Socratus
• Re: [epistemology 13359] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13359] God and Soul in Quantum Theory. Sadovnik Socratus
• [epistemology 13356] earlychildhood learning and foundation program in design education jinan
• [epistemology 13356] About philosophy of science. Book “Facing Up”, by Steven Weinberg. 'Sadovnik Socratus' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13359] About philosophy of science. Book “Facing Up”, by Steven Weinberg. Dr Garshagu MV Atovigba
• [epistemology 13354] Between classical and meridian probability theories Michael Atovigba
• Re: [epistemology 13353] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13353] The Universe: two scenarios. /by Israel Socratus/ 'Sadovnik Socratus' via Epistemology
• Re: [epistemology 13351] Digest for [email protected] - 2 updates in 2 topics Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13349] Big Bang: Time 'Sadovnik Socratus' via Epistemology
• [epistemology 13349] God particles, without Nobel Prize. / by Socratus/ 'Sadovnik Socratus' via Epistemology
• [epistemology 13349] Does the Alphabet slow down our thinking? Awori
• Re: [epistemology 13346] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic Michael Atovigba
  • Re: [epistemology 13347] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic awori achoka
• [epistemology 13346] God and Soul in Quantum Theory. / By Socratus. / socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13342] Transdiciplinarity Adrian Ferent
• [epistemology 13340] Good afternoon Kathryn Shattler
  • [epistemology 13342] Re: Good afternoon 'nominal9' via Epistemology
• [epistemology 13339] Mathematics / Physics / Quantum theory and God / Gods. socratus sadovnik
  • [epistemology 13340] Re: Mathematics / Physics / Quantum theory and God / Gods. archytas
• [epistemology 13338] Infinity: fact, fiction, solution. socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13337] An alternative to the "big bang", "black hole", "ideal gas" . socratus sadovnik
  • Re: [epistemology 13343] An alternative to the "big bang", "black hole", "ideal gas" . awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13344] An alternative to the "big bang", "black hole", "ideal gas" . Sam Carana
• [epistemology 13334] My quantum theory which breaks the wall of Planck scale Adrian Ferent
• [epistemology 13334] Pauli Exclusion Principle / by Socratus / socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13331] Today Quantum mechanics is "non-mechanical" theory. socratus sadovnik
  • [epistemology 13333] Re: Today Quantum mechanics is "non-mechanical" theory. archytas
• Re: [epistemology 13322] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic Michael Atovigba
  • Re: [epistemology 13327] Digest for [email protected] - 1 update in 1 topic 'nominal9' via Epistemology
• [epistemology 13320] Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13322] Re: Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? archytas
  • [epistemology 13324] Re: Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13325] Re: Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? archytas
  • [epistemology 13326] Re: Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13328] Re: Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? archytas
  • [epistemology 13329] Re: Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13330] Re: Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? archytas
  • [epistemology 13332] Re: Why do the ADDED DIGIT SUMS of all(?) Multiples of 9 equal 9? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
• [epistemology 13316] A prime number equation found from Behaviour of primes and odd composites Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13307] Observation and mind. (Socratus dilettante opinion) socratus sadovnik
  • Re: [epistemology 13307] Observation and mind. (Socratus dilettante opinion) awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13310] Re: Observation and mind. (Socratus dilettante opinion) socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13284] Great site, great people. 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13284] Re: Great site, great people. archytas
  • [epistemology 13286] Re: Great site, great people. 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13287] Re: Great site, great people. archytas
  • [epistemology 13290] Re: Great site, great people. 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13291] Re: Great site, great people. archytas
  • [epistemology 13292] Re: Great site, great people. archytas
  • [epistemology 13295] Re: Great site, great people. 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13296] Re: Great site, great people. archytas
  • [epistemology 13297] Re: Great site, great people. archytas
  • [epistemology 13298] Re: Great site, great people. 'nominal9' via Epistemology
• [epistemology 13282] proton-magnetic theory needed Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13282] Heisenberg Uncertainty principle: (ab ≠ ba) and Electron. socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13277] What happened to the newsgroup anyway? Lonnie Clay
  • [epistemology 13278] Re: What happened to the newsgroup anyway? Lonnie Clay
  • Re: [epistemology 13278] What happened to the newsgroup anyway? Javed
  • Re: [epistemology 13279] What happened to the newsgroup anyway? Sam Carana
  • Re: [epistemology 13281] What happened to the newsgroup anyway? Lonnie Clay
• [epistemology 13274] BSU lecturer discovers formula for exact total count count of primes up to a natural number Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13271] Nature and Infinity. socratus sadovnik
  • [epistemology 13272] Re: Nature and Infinity. nominal9
• [epistemology 13269] Quintessence (physics) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia nominal9
  • [epistemology 13270] Re: Quintessence (physics) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia nominal9
• [epistemology 13267] Matter, Eternity, Time socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13265] When an idea is lost, then new words would be invented. socratus sadovnik
  • Re: [epistemology 13265] When an idea is lost, then new words would be invented. awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13268] Re: When an idea is lost, then new words would be invented. nominal9
• [epistemology 13260] Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus sadovnik
  • [epistemology 13261] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus sadovnik
  • Re: [epistemology 13261] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13293] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? archytas
  • Re: [epistemology 13293] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13263] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus sadovnik
  • [epistemology 13264] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? nominal9
  • [epistemology 13288] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? archytas
  • Re: [epistemology 13288] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13299] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13300] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus sadovnik
  • Re: [epistemology 13300] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13302] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? archytas
  • RE: [epistemology 13302] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13304] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? archytas
  • RE: [epistemology 13304] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus
  • RE: [epistemology 13305] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus
  • [epistemology 13311] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • [epistemology 13312] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • RE: [epistemology 13312] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus
  • RE: [epistemology 13335] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13314] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? archytas
  • [epistemology 13315] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? 'nominal9' via Epistemology
  • RE: [epistemology 13315] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? socratus
  • [epistemology 13321] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? archytas
  • [epistemology 13309] Re: Can *Physics* be evolutionary theory? archytas
• [epistemology 13259] The photon and the electron are one and the same particle in different conditions. socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13255] Electron – spin – quantum vacuum fluctuation. socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13254] GRT - Essence: socratus sadovnik
  • [epistemology 13256] Re: GRT - Essence: socratus sadovnik
  • [epistemology 13258] Re: GRT - Essence: nominal9
• [epistemology 13253] Physicists Francois Englert of Belgium and Peter Higgs of Britain socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13252] Inertia and Energy. socratus sadovnik
• [epistemology 13250] Can a double oxidation phenomenon generate an electric current? sorin
• [epistemology 13248] Vacuum and Entropy. sadovnik socratus
  • [epistemology 13249] Re: Vacuum and Entropy. nominal9
  • [epistemology 13249] Re: Vacuum and Entropy. socratus sadovnik
• Re: [epistemology 13245] Digest for [email protected] - 1 Message in 1 Topic Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13234] Reference frames and Existence. sadovnik socratus
  • [epistemology 13235] Re: Reference frames and Existence. Lonnie Clay
  • [epistemology 13236] Re: Reference frames and Existence. Craig Weinberg
  • Re: [epistemology 13236] Re: Reference frames and Existence. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13239] Re: Reference frames and Existence. Craig Weinberg
  • Re: [epistemology 13240] Re: Reference frames and Existence. sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13237] Re: Reference frames and Existence. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13240] Reference frames and Existence. awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13241] Reference frames and Existence. awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13243] Reference frames and Existence. Craig Weinberg
  • Re: [epistemology 13245] Reference frames and Existence. sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13245] Reference frames and Existence. sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13243] Reference frames and Existence. i.sadovnik socratus
  • [epistemology 13245] Re: Reference frames and Existence. sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13246] Re: Reference frames and Existence. awori achoka
• [epistemology 13220] Banks...Basel III regime nominal9
• [epistemology 13215] Quantum state of my mind Awori
  • [epistemology 13216] Re: Quantum state of my mind nominal9
  • Re: [epistemology 13216] Re: Quantum state of my mind awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13218] Re: Quantum state of my mind nominal9
  • [epistemology 13219] Re: Quantum state of my mind nominal9
• [epistemology 13213] IMF: U.S. budget cuts too fast, slowing recovery nominal9
• [epistemology 13212] Heist... Who stole the American Dream nominal9
• [epistemology 13211] Can you explain this?.... nominal9
• [epistemology 13208] Stocks Drop After Economic Reports; Dow Falls 150 nominal9
  • [epistemology 13208] Re: Stocks Drop After Economic Reports; Dow Falls 150 archytas
  • [epistemology 13210] Re: Stocks Drop After Economic Reports; Dow Falls 150 nominal9
• [epistemology 13205] Secret Bank Account Tax Cheats on the Run? nominal9
• [epistemology 13201] Judge rules against 'America's toughest sheriff' in racial profiling lawsuit nominal9
• [epistemology 13198] Wall Street... Filthy Lucre Corrupting, again..... nominal9
• [epistemology 13187] Economic BUST coming? nominal9
  • [epistemology 13188] Re: Economic BUST coming? archytas
  • [epistemology 13190] Re: Economic BUST coming? Lonnie Clay
  • [epistemology 13191] Re: Economic BUST coming? nominal9
  • [epistemology 13192] Re: Economic BUST coming? nominal9
• [epistemology 13185] PHOTON... just plain energy packet?.... or mystical conscious force? nominal9
  • Re: [epistemology 13185] PHOTON... just plain energy packet?.... or mystical conscious force? awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13187] Re: PHOTON... just plain energy packet?.... or mystical conscious force? archytas
  • Re: [epistemology 13193] PHOTON... just plain energy packet?.... or mystical conscious force? nominal9
  • Re: [epistemology 13194] PHOTON... just plain energy packet?.... or mystical conscious force? nominal9
  • [epistemology 13194] Re: PHOTON... just plain energy packet?.... or mystical conscious force? archytas
  • [epistemology 13196] Re: PHOTON... just plain energy packet?.... or mystical conscious force? nominal9
• Re: [epistemology 13183] Digest for [email protected] - 2 Messages in 1 Topic Michael Atovigba
• [epistemology 13162] SRT by an uneducated Socratus. sadovnik socratus
  • [epistemology 13164] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. nominal9
  • Re: [epistemology 13165] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13166] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13167] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13169] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. nominal9
  • Re: [epistemology 13170] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13172] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. nominal9
  • [epistemology 13172] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13173] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13174] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13175] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13176] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13178] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. nominal9
  • Re: [epistemology 13178] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13179] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13180] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. sadovnik socratus
  • [epistemology 13181] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13182] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. awori achoka
  • [epistemology 13196] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. sadovnik socratus
  • [epistemology 13198] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. archytas
  • [epistemology 13200] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. nominal9
  • [epistemology 13201] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. archytas
  • [epistemology 13203] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. nominal9
  • [epistemology 13203] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. sadovnik socratus
  • [epistemology 13205] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. sadovnik socratus
  • [epistemology 13207] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. nominal9
  • [epistemology 13214] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. Awori
  • Re: [epistemology 13221] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13221] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. awori achoka
  • Re: [epistemology 13222] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13223] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. Craig Weinberg
  • Re: [epistemology 13224] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. i.sadovnik socratus
  • Re: [epistemology 13225] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. Craig Weinberg
  • Re: [epistemology 13226] Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus. i.sadovnik socratus

• Earlier messages