On 26 Lug, 20:19, moralfinite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't get your initial point. "Science philosophers reason about > scientific knowledge." > > Math cannot create absolutes.
Math can create result without a solution, like the periordic: 10 : 9 ) 1,11111111.... that is at the base of our conception of the FUTURE time, that is always 1/10 of its unit and <for ever> > humans -finite beings cannot create absolutes. This calcusus is exactly that made by our intelligence, to IMAGINE the future ant to have the <present time> in the unit defined by the comma. > > Myth according to Egyptians that there were 360 days in a year but > Osiris made a deal with the Moon to add 5 days so he could have a > child. > In a year there are 36 days as the degrees, more the freedom in the space system that has 3 component lines xyz. Since 10 is our mind's cycle, 10 -3 = 7 is the freedom in each line and 7+7+7=21 is all the freedom in the 3 component xyz. Since the presence is 1/4, as t/xyzt, we have that the present time is 1/4 of 21, that is 5.25. In this way 360 +5.25 is the whole that contains as the freedom's presence, as its 360 degrees of movement, and the result is 365.25, equal to 365 days and 6 hours 24th. So, everything is defined by the math of the relations. > > So if a man finds a relationship between gravity and earth it does not > follow that he can define Space and Time. > It isn't so. The meter, the second and the kilogram were just defined by the Earth cycle. 1/4 of its Meridian was put equal to <the time> in line. 3/4 of the Meridian was put equal to <the space having 3 dimensions of time in line> > How are you defining "science" - "reason" - "scientific"? "science" is the actual knowledge of men, and it reveal the Truth until a contrary proof. "reason" is the work of our intelligence, and offten we haven't reason, because we are doing mistakes. "scientific" regards the "science" as its attribute. > > Sure, anyone can use a formula based on constants and do the figures. > fine. But who can prove the constants are valid? Who can prove the > formula is valid? Maybe the math experts before you assumed too many > things or took to many liberties. > The "truth" is an attribute, like a Faith... until a proof doesn't prove that it is not true one! Every formula has this risk. But we must do these formulations to can be in action. > It is clear you learned math formulas and constants but did you verify > the formula or constant? Yes, I did. > > Science is not 100% accurate it is an educated guess. Generally > philosophers promote arguments which have the least amount of > contradictions. > It seems easier to prove what isn't true than prove what is true. It is realy in this way! > Is logic a science that depends on how you define science. > Is math a science that depends on how you define logic. > Is science a science? It depends on how you define knowledge. How do > you define knowledge? -well that depends on you define human > existence. The knowledge is a necessary <risk> and <supposition>! Without a thesis it is impossible to chose! But we must do always Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis to well understand. And it is a process whithout any end. > I like epoche arguments. > > I don't take human intelligence so serious. I used to but I > discovered a term by Pia Mellody, a psychologist, called "Intellectual > Abuse". We can use what we have! Only what we have! > Intellectual Abuse is when someone expects you to trust their > assertions purely on the basis of their name or reputation NOT by your > personal observations. This <abuse> doesn't regard the imagination. We perceive every shape of the world through our <imagination> in the light, the colour... etc. and in the times, spaces... etc. because the existence, in its fundament is a binary order as 001010100101000 of a DVD. So who stars from this <reality> having all our attributions as if they were in the nature, and, afterwards, says that the <imagination> is a bad thing, is a mistake, because our reality is real ne in itself... I think that he hasn't reason and that the <intellectual abuse> isn't an <abuse> but only a way to realize more deeply the <true> reality of the world, that is <trascendent one>! > > Have you ever been in a spaceship -are you sure the earth is round? I > haven't. I basically just live on a flat surface -one room at a time. > Oh all this ins't sure! Earth and everything are onli ORDERS as this: 00100100111010010. Were ist the Earth? Where is its shape? > Yes, that is extreme but very humbling. Just search the web -there > are several websites that dismiss the findings of all the Einstein's > as hogwash. > > Why do I need absolutes about space or time? This ABSOLUTE means only TOTAL. The "absolute" water that is contained in a glass or in a bottle. Sine I have to measure it, I do in this way: I take 1/10 of this water and, through it, I count the 9/10 that remain. But - doing so - I count 9/1 that is equal to 9. It isn't the <absolute> quantity, but only the unitary one! So, if we have 100 apples and 2 boys and want to divide it, if we do the division 100:2=50 we have considered the <absolute> quantities. If we use the unitary quantity 99/1 (of 100) and 1/1 (of 2) and divide the unitary quantities, we have: 99/1 : 1/1 = 99/1 and there is not JUSTICE, because ONE boy must have only ONE apple, to measure, through the ratio 1/1, the ratio 99/1. The unitary system of counting is based on the JNIUSTICE betwen the 2 boys! It is necessary to consider the WHOLE, the ABSOLUTE quantity, and non the unitary one! Once I determined there > wasn't any ghost named god and there wasn't any such thing as > infinity. The next step was taking a look at all the apes on earth and > noticing that no one is changing in to a human. The rest of my values > kind of fell into place automatically after that. Well, peace of > nature to you, moralfinite All the ways are useful. I think that anyone MUST THINK through his mind. The Faith cannot substitute the single EGO. Every EGO has the FREE WILL! But it is not the FREE WILL about the creation of our <real> world, but of our <mental> world. We are MADE (by the Absolute GOD), but we <MUST MAKE> OUR GOD, in our mind, like the DIVINE SOLUTION of our own LIMITS. Every man has a different life and so he MUST HAVE a different IDEAL SULUTION. Afterwards GOD (the Absolute that contains us) has this exact our HELP, to define ALL the POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS for all the possible cases that we are liveing. And GOD trusts, has Faith in us... because HE is OUR EXISTENCE. Our <persons> are only <characters> (like Miky Mouse), and our Soul is Divine one, being God's Holy Spirit, like Miky Mouse is the LIFE of Walt Disney put in its <character>. Hi. Romano --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
