The main use of this stuff is likely to be measuring and manipulation
at these small levels. CERN hopes not to picture the Higgs' Boson but
catch something of its decay. Perhaps I should have written 'picture'
as "picture" or {picture}?
On 6 Sep, 12:48, adrf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Flapsinatingly intruiging. What the poor sod info consumer does not know is
> what he gets is
> instrumental manipulation to give him a sense image of it all. I recall
> seeing the first piccie
> of an atom somewhere over 2 decades agon. The wrinkly surface is most likely
> a field'wave
> interference as interpreted Quantum fashion. So what it actually looks like
> had we nano sized
> eyes only god knows. My chip, 1.8 Ghz has I'm told 43 million chips in it.
> Nice though.
>
> adrian
>
>
>
> archytas wrote:
> >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/09/080904115132.htmhas a
> > comparison of gold atoms pictured by an electron microscope and the
> > new helium-ion microscope. Might be of interest in getting a glimpse
> > of just how small we can 'photograph' and what an atom looks like.- Hide
> > quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
