http://saintgasoline.com/comics/2007-03-02.JPG

On Sep 16, 11:50 am, Georges Metanomski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Sat, 9/13/08, stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [epistemology 9521] Re: God's Particle
> > To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]>
> > Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 11:26 AM
> > could anyone teach me my doubt:
>
> > in LHC, the particles in clockwise will speed up to 99% of
> > light
> > speed, and anticlockwise particles also will be speed up to
> > 99% of
> > light speed, now:
>
> > a. what will be their Relative speed when impact?
>
> ======================
> G:
> Let o be an observer in CERN,
> c, a the clockwise and anticlockwise protons
> Vac - speed of c seen from a
> Vao  - speed of o seen from a = 0.99C
> Voc  - speed of c seen from o = 0.99C
>
> Then Vac = cumul(Vao,Voc)
> where "cumul" is the Lorentz transformation based speed
> cumulation function
> Vac=(Vao + Voc)/(1+VaoVoc/C^2)
> Vac=C(0.99+0.99)/(1+0.99^2*C^2/C^2)
> Vac=1.98C/(1+0.99^2)
> Vac=C*1.98/1+0.9801) = C*1.98/1.9801
> Vac=0.999949C
> ======================> b. in such high speed, the Time will become very 
> slow? If
> > so, how long
> > will they taken to impact?
>
> ====================
> G:
> One a's revolution of the colider will take 0.4 ns and o's
> clock will show it as such. Indeed o's clock is not
> affected by the movement of a.
> o would find a's time dilated and a's clock ticking
> slower and vice versa a would find o's clock ticking
> equally slower, but each will find its own time and
> clock unaffected.
> Georges.
> ==================
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to