Timathy, I'm pleased. I too was booted out of Mind's eye,which made my friends snort and some members sympathise. I took, at the time the Elephant test, suggested by Orn and scored 12/100 with the suggestion I should become more aggressive, the reason guiven by Chris Jenkins, ower for my being banned from Mind's eye. So consider it a compliment. Yes, dump it on the readers, use KNOL, look it over. It's not your problem what the reaction will be.
Adrian. chreodman wrote: > Sam was kind enough to give me some great advice as it pertains to the > increased venue capabilities at Yahoo groups, etc. When I get "set up" > there, I'll share the url with the membership here. Now I fear I'm > spending too much time addressing the inadequate presentation > capabilities here at Google Groups... at least for my purposes. PLEASE > forgive me, as I am new to this networking stuff. Any who, my thanks > to Ornamentalmind & Adrian for the "solid-on" input... their critiques > seem fair & balanced enough for me to take heed and reassess the > manner of this model's dissemination. The "piece meal" fashion was > taken so as not to "overwhelm." > > As "intuitive" as we've tried to make the pubic model, it is > nevertheless comprised of numerous linked architectures. It is better, > as Adrian has pointed out, that I just lay it out in one fell swoop > and let the chips fall where they may. Some will get, other may not, > but the awareness will be gotten at any rate. and we won't have to > address the individual questions accept for "suggested readings pages" > linked with the FAQs. > > I probably need to begin with a full overview, so people can make > their initial assessment as to whether it is "worth" their efforts at > internalization. It truly is, but that's everyone's individual > "call." We are wanting to empower as many as will make the efforts > necessary, but that may resolve itself as those who have indeed > profited from its internalization witness to that effect. We thus far > have but a scant number who can attest to the model impetus.I'll be > keeping "in touch" but my posts are not meeting with the kinds of > response for which we were hoping. I'm hearing some frustration & > confusion - I think not including the "graphics" from the onset is > part of the problem, and as Adrian was quick to point out, "URLS, > URLS, URLS." Of course, he's right, but I got summarily booted from > the group MIND"S EYE for even suggesting a link... I understand there > is "zero tolerance" for even perceived "spam" in this group. > I felt this might be the case with most groups at Google, but I was in > error regarding this assessment... so, I'll spare the group any > further "piecemeal posts" and create a new group / blog where the > whole model is displayed in its entirety (except for the implicate > base, I can only provide an example of that - it has to do with > proprietary concerns, etc.... after our prototype is realized, thenn, > I can probably share the whole "implicate base") > > Again, my best to all the membership... I'll stay "in touch" - but > those with whom I found displeasure can sigh a sense of relief and > they can go on,trying to "hijack" the group as Adrian put it so well. > Certainly, Sam wouldn't stand for it, so is Georges his brother-in-law > or something? What keeps the membership from policing its ranks? > Honestly, Georges' last post concerning my "intrusion" was almost > laughable and was reminiscent of Nixon's "Checkers Speech." Still, my > efforts have disheartened a few, and quite frankly, that ain't me!!! I > have other "options" and some of these guys are probably just tryin' > to find a home, & you guys are "A-okay" for puttin' up with them, even > if I sense that you're somewhat disgruntled with their online > behaviors. We all have our crosses to bear, so be kind, and extend the > olive branch to Georges & "the other guy," from me as well... I didn't > mean to ruffle any feathers. Bye for now. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
