THat piece of gobbledygook. as Robert Graves called it, sums up to saying that BEGINNING axiomatically will never get you finished. As William Blake wrote it up. "To see the world in a grain of sand" takes an intuitive or holistic leap of imagination no rule following can complete. You cannot tease out a whole from any set of parts. adrian
adrian wrote: > > adrian wrote, > > > I've hit a glitch. I usually dream these wee problems. I don't know in what > kind of space or > dimension that is supposed to be BUT whichever kind of finite cum infinite > space, or time for that > matter, however created or evolved by whatever twist of ingenuity it turns > out that the universe > will be forever unfinishable as a finite version or arrive at a last particle > of an infinite one. > That, I am sad, or not sad for that matter, to say includes Georges axiomatic > universe. Even for an > infinite universe with infinitely small particles that's no way we'll ever > see the job finished. > Either it needs an extra dimension beyond whatever dimensions it is already > supposed to have or not > OR it will need a something not already there to finish the job. Even for an > infinite universe I > don't see how we can finish the job without an extra no-space-no-time sneaked > in by an not already > there. > > adrian > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
