=================== # Everybody seems to agree that "objective" science explicitly based on supernatural mysteries is something utterly strange: it's a much stranger doctrine than any most esoteric religion, which doesn't pretend at least to any objectivity and logic... And nevertheless it is precisely that kind of "objective" knowledge that continues to be UNIQUELY (and very generously!) supported in ALL science institutions (private initiatives including). How indeed can one have a consistent understanding of quantum particle behaviour if that huge, multi-billion enterprise cannot even say what the real, even simplest elementary particle (e.g. photon or electron) actually is, in its physical structure and dynamics, while replacing it with an abstract symbol obeying abstract, postulated (and completely "magic"!) rules? So they end up now with an explicit sectarian religion called "mathematical universe" and supported by the dominating establishment priests from all the great faculties...
Realistic alternatives to that continuing math-physical delirium certainly exist but they are rejected without discussion by the dominating, effectively totalitarian regime (Peer Review and Co.). So when Gisin allegedly "hopes that the work will stimulate theorists to come up with new ways of explaining the spooky effect", he is "slightly diverging from the truth" (or intentionally lying, to be exact!). As if he, or Geoff Blumfiel, or anyone else may ignore the fact that those "spooky effects" and related open trickery exist in the official science framework already for a century and nothing ever changes, despite innumerable theoretical efforts (starting already from the "great Einstein" with his unlimited staff) but always artificially reduced to a very special, now rigorously specified approach of unitary science http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.4562 See e.g. http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0211071 http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0401164 for a review of fundamental physics without supernatural mysteries, a theory that is there for a decade already, quite accessible on the web and directly developing the ideas of the great Louis de Broglie who had clearly shown a way out of the spooky science impasse many years ago (see http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9911107 ), but this clearly designated "new way" (now successfully completed) remains officially ignored, for decades, despite the formally "encouraged" search for it. It is that kind of real science operation that "doesn’t make any sense, honestly" and while it senselessly persists on the background of ‘ officially accepted ‘ lies, no positive, fruitful and problem-solving knowledge development can restart, irrespective of explicitly proposed problem solutions and realistic, consistent and experimentally confirmed quantum-physics framework. 14 Aug, 2008 Posted by: Andrei Kirilyuk http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080813/full/news.2008.1038.html =========================== --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
