"What we must not forget is that D-Day was a time and a place
where the bravery and the selflessness of a few was able to
change the course of an entire century"
Obama

This is the sort of rhetorical nonsense of the class that suggests
that Ronald Ray-gun, was responsible for the downfall of the Soviet
Union, even when Gorbachev is quoted as saying that "the Beatles
showed the Russian people that there was a different way to live".
Apart from giving any credit to Gorbachev himself we know that
Reagan's bellicose approach merely created further retrenchment to
traditional Soviet ideas.
Many Russians will tell you how boot-leg copies of Beatles songs and
the sentiment of freedom that they suggested did more to change
attitudes. It was the Beatles generation that brought down the Soviet
Union like a virus spreading the English language and a non
confrontational plea to free thinking.
So much for alternative histories. What of D-Day?
In comparison to the battle of Kursk (Aug 1943) in which Russia
mobilised 1,300,000 men, 3,600 tanks, 20,000 artillery pieces and
2,792 aircraft (this does not include civilian support) ,D-Day was
something of a side-show landing only 175,000 troops landing on 6 June
1944 and 195,700 Allied naval and merchant navy personnel.
One wonders if the Russian effort had not been so massive and their
success so great, D Day would probably never have been possible the
following year. There were more Russian casualties in that battle than
allies landed in Normandy.
I would not want to diminish the efforts and sacrifice of the allied
soldiers but if we were to look for a single event that was
responsible for "chang[ing] the  course of an entire century." Then
Kursk would have to be the first candidate.
In history, however, there are no single causes responsible for the
course of history.


On Sep 4, 7:46 pm, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote:
> The essay "Obama in Wonderland" has been uploaded to
>
> http://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/POLITICS/obama_in_wonderland.html
>
> I got a lot of reactions. Certain called it poignant satire and I found
> it most gratifying, others suggested additionally some supplements,
> which I considered with appreciation. But many qualified it
> (arbitrarily of course) as absurdity, calumny, defamation and
> scandalmongering. I thank them from all my heart; I intended my
> "Obama" to be a ecrit a scandale and they prove that I'm not far
> off the mark.
>
> Georges.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to