Comment: It does seem like a paradox, doesn't it?
Actually, these are two unrelated concepts. Baryons represent detectable matter. Dark matter represents undetectable matter. Different stuff. That still leaves the question about physic's hands, though.... / NoPlate / === . I think that actually, the ‘Baryon asymmetry ‘and ‘Dark matter ‘ both belong to one conception. Why? Because antiparticles exist in ‘ Dirac sea ‘, in Vacuum and ‘ dark matter ‘, by idea, must exist there too. They both belong to one and the same reference frame. Now the questions are: ‘ does dark matter consist of antiparticles or of some kind of different particles ? ’, ‘ do antiparticles make dark matter ?’ To answer to this question we must know that Vacuum is. But it is a pity, we still don’t have answer to this question. And Dirac said: ‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion, is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description of something more complex? ‘ ==== . So , all discussions are tautology without understanding that Vacuum is. Israel Sadovnik Socratus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
