To talk about vacuum you need discrete elements, vacuum is discontinuity, and that can only be a concept. Vacuum only exists as a concept, it lives in your mind only, see my post of silence below, this is the same. There is no vacuum out there,
On 17 out, 03:36, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Comment: > > It does seem like a paradox, doesn't it? > > Actually, these are two unrelated concepts. > Baryons represent detectable matter. > Dark matter represents undetectable matter. > Different stuff. > > That still leaves the question about physic's hands, though.... > / NoPlate / > === . > > I think that actually, the ‘Baryon asymmetry ‘and ‘Dark matter ‘ > both belong to one conception. > Why? > Because antiparticles exist in ‘ Dirac sea ‘, in Vacuum and > ‘ dark matter ‘, by idea, must exist there too. > They both belong to one and the same reference frame. > > Now the questions are: > ‘ does dark matter consist of antiparticles or of > some kind of different particles ? ’, > ‘ do antiparticles make dark matter ?’ > > To answer to this question we must know that Vacuum is. > But it is a pity, we still don’t have answer to this question. > And Dirac said: > ‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion, > is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t > correctly > describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct > description > of something more complex? ‘ > ==== . > So , > all discussions are tautology without understanding that Vacuum is. > > Israel Sadovnik Socratus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
