“… Attention attraction is little understood in knowledge justification.” – Archy
No doubt there is truth in this. Sadly, the field of knowledge justification is mostly so axiomatically impaired as to be comparable to attempting complex calculus without the use of most simple arithmetic symbols. On Oct 19, 7:23 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > The pub once had a backwards clock. Now we just rewind our watches 30 > years on entry. Very clever OM - no doubt we will soon be into > Ornamatapeia! Attention attraction is little understood in knowledge > justification. > > On 18 Oct, 19:02, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > "...the question of why we remain so poor with language and how we > > elevate its use ahead of decent doing." - Neil > > > The assumption of 'poor'ness to me is founded upon the very > > subjectivity of language itself. Of course, as to the ‘why’, when the > > former is not recognized, it can be 'seen' as being reality itself > > when one ruminates and obsesses constantly. One of the better lines in > > the quite naïve movie “Crocodile Dundee” could be heard when they were > > eating in a hash joint in town and a bag lady came up and asked: “Does > > the noise in my head bother you?”. So what one places attention upon > > answers the ‘how’ of the issue. > > > On Oct 17, 6:49 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I tried Sean's group, but found myself spammed - not intentionally > > > from the group. I rather like Wittgenstein and he wrote very little - > > > others generally spoiled the white paper. After a few insights I find > > > myself utterly uninterested except in the question of why we remain so > > > poor with language and how we elevate its use ahead of decent doing. > > > > On 25 Sep, 20:53, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > For the record, I researched Sean and his group...even became a member > > > > and have read many posts there. Even though I do not embrace their > > > > overall philosophy, their presentations are the most coherent I have > > > > found in Google groups to date. > > > > > On Sep 25, 7:51 am, einseele <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Intolerance is like racism, dont you see, > > > > > you should apologize indeed > > > > > > Hey Sean, I apologize for this, your are welcome to this group! > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > On 23 set, 11:45, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > If you feel not stupid enough, than you may join the suite of > > > > > > > Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. > > > > > > Assistant Professor > > > > > > Wright State University > > > > > > > and improve your stupidity by fatuous admiration of the most > > > > > > asinine guy who ever spoiled white paper, to wit Wittgenstein. > > > > > > > Georges.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
