Indeed this is true, Om Mani Padme Hum Om Mani Padme Hum Om Mani Padme Hum
-------------------------------------------------- From: "ornamentalmind" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 9:22 PM To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]> Subject: [epistemology 10889] Re: New Wittgenstein-Centered Discussion Group > > “… Attention attraction is little understood in knowledge > justification.” – Archy > > No doubt there is truth in this. > > Sadly, the field of knowledge justification is mostly so axiomatically > impaired as to be comparable to attempting complex calculus without > the use of most simple arithmetic symbols. > > > On Oct 19, 7:23 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >> The pub once had a backwards clock. Now we just rewind our watches 30 >> years on entry. Very clever OM - no doubt we will soon be into >> Ornamatapeia! Attention attraction is little understood in knowledge >> justification. >> >> On 18 Oct, 19:02, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > "...the question of why we remain so poor with language and how we >> > elevate its use ahead of decent doing." - Neil >> >> > The assumption of 'poor'ness to me is founded upon the very >> > subjectivity of language itself. Of course, as to the ‘why’, when the >> > former is not recognized, it can be 'seen' as being reality itself >> > when one ruminates and obsesses constantly. One of the better lines in >> > the quite naïve movie “Crocodile Dundee” could be heard when they were >> > eating in a hash joint in town and a bag lady came up and asked: “Does >> > the noise in my head bother you?”. So what one places attention upon >> > answers the ‘how’ of the issue. >> >> > On Oct 17, 6:49 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > I tried Sean's group, but found myself spammed - not intentionally >> > > from the group. I rather like Wittgenstein and he wrote very >> > > little - >> > > others generally spoiled the white paper. After a few insights I >> > > find >> > > myself utterly uninterested except in the question of why we remain >> > > so >> > > poor with language and how we elevate its use ahead of decent doing. >> >> > > On 25 Sep, 20:53, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > For the record, I researched Sean and his group...even became a >> > > > member >> > > > and have read many posts there. Even though I do not embrace their >> > > > overall philosophy, their presentations are the most coherent I >> > > > have >> > > > found in Google groups to date. >> >> > > > On Sep 25, 7:51 am, einseele <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > > Intolerance is like racism, dont you see, >> > > > > you should apologize indeed >> >> > > > > Hey Sean, I apologize for this, your are welcome to this group! >> >> > > > > Carlos >> >> > > > > On 23 set, 11:45, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > If you feel not stupid enough, than you may join the suite of >> >> > > > > > Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. >> > > > > > Assistant Professor >> > > > > > Wright State University >> >> > > > > > and improve your stupidity by fatuous admiration of the most >> > > > > > asinine guy who ever spoiled white paper, to wit Wittgenstein. >> >> > > > > > Georges.- Hide quoted text - >> >> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
