--- On Thu, 10/22/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: [epistemology 10894] What is the nature of Light Quanta ? > To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 1:24 PM > > What is the nature of Light Quanta ? > In my opinion this question is similar to other one: > How can the SRT be understood ? ============= G: By thinking. If one does, it's childish to see that it's the simplest possible deduction from the empiric invariance of C. ============== S: > More than 100 years have passed when SRT was created > but the discussions about it are still going on . ============== G: Where? SR is classic old hat. Even GR is not discussed. Most discussions pertain to quantum physics, to QFT, Standard Model and unification. ============== S: > I suggest my own opinion about SRT (Light Quanta & > Vacuum) > === . > > One of the SRT laws says: > The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant > equal to : c=1. No other particles can reach such speed. =============== G: SR does not deal with photons. They pertain to - and initialized - the quantum physics. Photons are observed by emission and absorbtion. What propagates is the other aspect of light - the wave. Electron waves and field aspects of all particles propagate at C. In that light I skip the rest. Georges. ==================== --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
