My intuition is maybe Maddy is known by the cowgate (Farm)??? where the malaysian bird was seen in N.E. England, under there nose as it is always an inside job, if it is connected to anyone else then I need more info.
-------------------------------------------------- From: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 11:48 AM To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]> Subject: [epistemology 10901] Re: What is the nature of h-bar ? > > > 1. > h is Quantum of action. > 2. > h exists because ‘ angular momentum ‘ is quantized.. > h is not a particle, either. > 3. > h is (h) just a constant of nature. > h has no spin, h is just a constant > ( h) isn't the particle. Just one of many characteristics it has. > 4. > h-bar is the Maltese representation of the Arabic letter ha. > They also have nouns and verbs in Maltese, but theirs actually > make > sense to speakers of at least one more language than you do. > 5. > . . . . > the inappropriate units of measurement in which > h-bar is too often expressed, most often > Joule-seconds or Newton-meters. > 6. > Planck's " h" is a quantity of action. Despite the ambiguity > beloved by present physicists, a quantity is not a particle. > 7 > Please excuse me for saying so, dear peasant, but you've > been sadly misled by your professors. The quantity h is > not a particle, and it doesn't rotate on its axis > / glird / > 7 > Now you are almost completely illicit. > You certainly haven't got a clue what you are talking about. > / Tom Davidson > Richmond, VA / > ==== . > # > There are many opinions about ( h). > And we can see that (h ) as ‘ something’ has > many characteristics. > Question. > To whom do the characteristics belong : > to wave, to Micky Mouse, to Superman . . . . ? > > It is hard to me to understand those people who observe > and see only one parameter of some object/ subject. > It reminds me the old story about three blind Indian men > who studied an elephant. One touched the elephant’s leg > an said it was a column, another one touching a stomach > told it was a ball, and the last holding the tail said it was > a snake. I think the Plank's constant (h ) is a ‘ modern > scientific elephant ‘ and many experts try to study it > using the ‘ blind method.’ > === . > S. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
