They did find a body of a girl of 17 today in the N.E. of England, in Durham on a farm, a 32 year old man has been arrested. Another phenomena happened again after I informed those I chose, my television set flashed three black screens of emptiness. And obviously you know what my views on emptiness is. But, because the UK is more like red china, I never get the back up or support or info I need to help change these things from happening. This is so sad. The most accurate was my phone call to our british help line Saneline, whom I said I wished the police would investigatge. How far this farm was from where the Malaysian bird was spotted, I do not know. Maybe someone can inform me.
-------------------------------------------------- From: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 11:48 AM To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]> Subject: [epistemology 10901] Re: What is the nature of h-bar ? > > > 1. > h is Quantum of action. > 2. > h exists because ‘ angular momentum ‘ is quantized.. > h is not a particle, either. > 3. > h is (h) just a constant of nature. > h has no spin, h is just a constant > ( h) isn't the particle. Just one of many characteristics it has. > 4. > h-bar is the Maltese representation of the Arabic letter ha. > They also have nouns and verbs in Maltese, but theirs actually > make > sense to speakers of at least one more language than you do. > 5. > . . . . > the inappropriate units of measurement in which > h-bar is too often expressed, most often > Joule-seconds or Newton-meters. > 6. > Planck's " h" is a quantity of action. Despite the ambiguity > beloved by present physicists, a quantity is not a particle. > 7 > Please excuse me for saying so, dear peasant, but you've > been sadly misled by your professors. The quantity h is > not a particle, and it doesn't rotate on its axis > / glird / > 7 > Now you are almost completely illicit. > You certainly haven't got a clue what you are talking about. > / Tom Davidson > Richmond, VA / > ==== . > # > There are many opinions about ( h). > And we can see that (h ) as ‘ something’ has > many characteristics. > Question. > To whom do the characteristics belong : > to wave, to Micky Mouse, to Superman . . . . ? > > It is hard to me to understand those people who observe > and see only one parameter of some object/ subject. > It reminds me the old story about three blind Indian men > who studied an elephant. One touched the elephant’s leg > an said it was a column, another one touching a stomach > told it was a ball, and the last holding the tail said it was > a snake. I think the Plank's constant (h ) is a ‘ modern > scientific elephant ‘ and many experts try to study it > using the ‘ blind method.’ > === . > S. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
