Thanks for butting in George. I thought I'd made my position clear
already. But it
seems people need clarification and re-clarification until they see
that no everyone
has faith in Platonic Ideals that exist somewhere 'out there'
regardless of humans.
They confuse the conception and description OF the phenomena with the
phenomena.


On May 5, 1:06 pm, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote:
> --- On Tue, 5/4/10, Enrique Fynn <[email protected]> wrote:
> chazwin...
> Let me get clarify some things...
> Do you think that science invented gravity?
>
> ===============
> G:
> Sorry for butting in.
> Of course science invented gravity or, better said, postulated gravity.
> Science endeavors to conceive abstract mental constructs destined to
> and exclusively justified by their capacity to coordinate mental
> perceptual events.
> Gravity is a case in point. It has been postulated and reformulated
> several times marking milestones in the progress of science.
> The current formulation is that of Riemann tensor associated with
> each point of a curved 4d SPACE.
> As every rational abstraction, gravity pertains exclusively to its
> abstract model and may not be reified by being exported to the
> transcendental "World-Out-There".
> It's irrational to speak about the unreachable, inaccessible and
> unknown transcendency. It's idiotic to pretend that it's populated
> with Riemann tensors.
>
> Georges
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Epistemology" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to