I agree as well to the position which clearly distinguish the transcendental world from any abstract model Gravity and all knowledge objects live only into models, but is good to say they point to the "world out there". Somehow they want the "out there", they refer, they say: "Gravity is true (of course true being a model as well)", and they interact, even invent a new "world out there", like for instance computer science.
I just want to add that there are also objects which have no "outheres", like math, logic, and others. And there is one, language, which is the intermediary in all cases. Language has an special position in this geometry Is there a transcendental side of language, religion so believes, the Word was even before creation according to the dogma. Or there is not a transcendental side, language points to...? The brain...? of course not, meanings are which cannot even be expressed in other's languages, language does not depend on any physical domain. Is everywhere and lives where? On 5 maio, 09:10, chazwin <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for butting in George. I thought I'd made my position clear > already. But it > seems people need clarification and re-clarification until they see > that no everyone > has faith in Platonic Ideals that exist somewhere 'out there' > regardless of humans. > They confuse the conception and description OF the phenomena with the > phenomena. > > On May 5, 1:06 pm, Georges Metanomski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > --- On Tue, 5/4/10, Enrique Fynn <[email protected]> wrote: > > chazwin... > > Let me get clarify some things... > > Do you think that science invented gravity? > > > =============== > > G: > > Sorry for butting in. > > Of course science invented gravity or, better said, postulated gravity. > > Science endeavors to conceive abstract mental constructs destined to > > and exclusively justified by their capacity to coordinate mental > > perceptual events. > > Gravity is a case in point. It has been postulated and reformulated > > several times marking milestones in the progress of science. > > The current formulation is that of Riemann tensor associated with > > each point of a curved 4d SPACE. > > As every rational abstraction, gravity pertains exclusively to its > > abstract model and may not be reified by being exported to the > > transcendental "World-Out-There". > > It's irrational to speak about the unreachable, inaccessible and > > unknown transcendency. It's idiotic to pretend that it's populated > > with Riemann tensors. > > > Georges > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Epistemology" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
