I tend to agree....Geneology has "relevance" for bigots and/or "master racers"
On Jul 8, 9:35 am, einseele <[email protected]> wrote: > Always called my attention the idea many people sustains as to > building "genealogical trees" > > And also I always felt sort of disgust for that idea. First because of > the ignorance regarding such artifacts, and second because the > impossible logic they try to convey. > > In short they describe parent relationships, (better not to think), > trying to fence... what? > > How to consider someone a relative on a far distant branch. Or also, > the opposite idea, how someone today or in the past or in the future > could possibly not be a cousin. > > And so you hear "I'm a direct descendant/relative of anybastardhere" > > As far as population grows exponentially I can only see a common tree. > No way of separate families. Even fishes are part of the list, or dust > BTW > > I believe this has to do with religion, ethnics, nationalities and > other shit balls alike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
