--- On Tue, 7/13/10, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote:

> I read both links, Georges... very
> interesting, especially the
> "natural cycle" explanation and the important part that
> "salinity"
> plays in affecting the freezing temperature of water.....
> 
> Anyway, Georges,... what do you think (scientifically and
> from a
> natural cycle standpoint) about the general conslucsions
> reached by
> the "academician" that I link to, paleoecologist Anthony D.
> Barnosky
> 
> http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2154
> 
> do you pretty much agree with this (his) scenario?
> 
==============
G:
Pretty much, with two exceptions:

1.He believes with pseudo-scientific committees commanded by corrupted 
politicians, that GW is caused by human actions, 
and reversible by their reversal.

QUOTE
... it is entirely possible that unless something is done to rein in greenhouse 
gas emissions, the planet could experience that magnitude of warming in a 
century or two.
UNQUOTE

Now, I believe to have shown that even if GW has been TRIGGERED
by human actions, it cannot be untriggered by their reversal. 


2.While he gives most instructive details about catastrophic sequels
of the GW, he restricts them to fauna and flora. Now, I love animals,
am active in their protection and helped defending Peta in a trial
impending its bankruptcy. Yet, I value people over animals and miss
in Barnosky's views references to deadly dangers of GW sequels for
hundreds of millions of people.

Let me quote bottom lines of my GW essay:

QUOTE 
You may trigger an avalanche by pulling the trigger of your
gun, but you won't stop it by pushing back the trigger.

Which actions seem advisable in this light?

1.Dissociate GW from Pollution, a distinct, equally critical 
problem, which should be investigated in its own context,
unaffected by political divagations about the GW. 

2.Admit that GW is inevitable and start immediately to plan 
actions aiming at saving millions endangered by inundations,
(expatriation, artificial islands, etc.) and other
sequels of the GW.
UNQUOTE

Georges.
=============


      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to