Correction: > > Bare Plurals.... to a "Nominalist".... are "words".... that just get > > in the way of actually understanding....
You just used the bare plural, "Bare Plurals." Funnier, yet. On Dec 8, 12:03 pm, aruzinsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 6, 11:34 am, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Blah, blah... > > Nominalism happens > > to be very staunchly in support of "empirical validation" > > Blah, blah... > > Then, where is YOUR empirical validation? > > > Blah, blah... > > Bare Plurals.... to a "Nominalist".... are "words".... that just get > > in the way of actually understanding.... > > Blah, blah... > > I agree that your words, especially the 300 in your last post, get in > the way of your understanding. My cat is more sapient than you > because he has no verbal delusions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
