On Oct 16, 4:12 am, sadovnik socratus <[email protected]> wrote:
> Comment by Frank Steve
> =.
> The Electron Conscious?

I think that electrons, and especially photons may not exist
independently of atoms. They may be more like 'atomic moods' which are
shared. Electromagnetic waves then are not an energy pseudosubstance
which occupies space, but rather they are propagated from node to
node, as in bacterial quorum sensing or a crowd 'wave' in a stadium.
Our only experience of electrons is through inference and detection by
instruments made of atoms, so that the mathematical observations would
be retained whether or not there are invisible particle-waves flying
around or not. I call this hypothesis Telesemantics and my overall
Theory of Everything is called Multisense Realism: 
http://s33light.org/post/11317186048

I think that telesemantics would still be plausible in the case that
subatomic particles are independent objects, but my hunch is that as
our observations push the envelope of our PRIF (Perceptual-Relativiy
Inertial Frame), they lose their objectivity and increasingly feed
back on the perceptual phenomenology of our instruments. Simply put,
it's not Newton that breaks down at the Classical Limit, it's
Copernicus. Objectivity is the waveform that collapses as we are left
holding the bag of measurement within self-measurement. I know it must
sound crazy and grandiose, but I think that I might actually be on the
right track. I kind of think that I might have solved the hard problem
of consciousness, and a number of other 'big question' that have
puzzled scientists and philosophers for centuries.

> At first glance this seems to be a rather senseless question. But then
> IONS founder has been known to ask “Does the Universe Perceive? The
> first is a micro question that implies the macro nature of the latter.
> So here is my reasoning. If electrons of an oxygen atom enter and then
> mysteriously leave their emergent atomic fields of manifestation in
> precise femtosecond timing …and then instantly change their enter-exit
> frequencies when their atoms nucleus combines with two hydrogen atoms
> to form water … how do they know how … and when to do this
> instantaneous switch? So the question is really two questions:
> 1 – Do electrons possess dynamic states of awareness?

Electrons *are* dynamic states of inter-atomic awareness possessed by
molecules.

> 2 – If so, are they also conscious … i.e. comparative reasoning?

No way of knowing. Atoms could have a single consciousness that
includes all atoms over all time or something like that. There maybe
is only one atom or quark that is just experiencing itself in
multiplicity. All kinds of exotic possibilities, but I tend to assume
a conservative Occam-centric view that atoms have a proto-awareness
that is as deterministic as it seems. They may not have access to
enough time or depth of qualia to have anything like a self awareness
- more of a sensorimotive witnessing of their own reflexive
participation in events. This presumption of determinism may only be
relativistic though - a function of the great difference in scale and
velocity (PRIF) between our world and theirs. For all we know, what we
detect of the microcosm may be a flatland slice of the least conscious
bits of matter. I have a hunch that it's neither completely
relativistic nor indexed absolutely.

> 3 – And if they do possess limited spans of conscious, do they self-
> control their reactive behaviors?

No way to know. If we looked at human cities from space, we could
wonder the same thing. We might assume urban development is a kind of
automotive mold growing near the coastal areas and rivers. We possess
consciousness and we are made of the same thing that they are, so
there is no reason to assume that this capacity arises magically out
of some occult configuration of neurons.

Craig

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

Reply via email to