Interesting. On Dec 18, 2011 7:08 AM, "Sam Carana" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's a fascinating topic, if one considers that communication > effectively takes place instantaneously in case of entangled objects. > > In this way, it defeats the speed limit of the speed of light. > > Cheers! > Sam Carana > > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 5:39 PM, awori achoka <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I am not physist...but could it be that at a certain level, nature is > > bounded by one dimension...an energy-time dimension that keeps the > universe > > together. > > > > On Dec 18, 2011 4:37 AM, "Sam Carana" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Apparently, it's not just happening at microscopic level, but also > >> with everyday objects. > >> See: > >> > >> > http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21235-entangled-diamonds-blur-quantumclassical-divide.html > >> http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-12-vibration-entangled-diamonds.html > >> > >> Cheers! > >> Sam Carana > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > On Dec 17, 10:28 pm, Sam Carana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> So, what's the story in case of entanglement? > >> >> > >> >> Cheers! > >> >> Sam Carana > >> > > >> > I don't know enough about how the experiments are actually conducted > >> > to really give any better than a guess. It's difficult to find > >> > accounts of the actual materials and observations online, since the > >> > existence of photons and other particles is so unquestioned, the > >> > experiments are described in terms which take that for granted. My > >> > guess though is that entanglement may be an example of observing our > >> > own equipment at such a microcosmic level, that what we are detecting > >> > has not developed any sense of space. We are basically pinging the > >> > singularity. It's hard to speculate on what sensorimotive experience > >> > is like on these levels - it may be the case that every particle, > >> > every quantum event is actually a diffracted instance of the > >> > singularity itself. There may only be one proton, it's just very very > >> > busy from out perspective. > >> > > >> > Craig > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "Epistemology" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > >> > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Epistemology" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
