Time is not seen as a physical entity or dimension these days Indeed, Einstein never interpreted time "t" as a fourth dimension of space. Space is not 3D + T, space is 4D. With clocks we measure numerical order of material change. This numerical order is the only time that exists in a physical world. With this approach all immediate information transfers of quantum physics are explained in a more appropriate way. 4D space is a medium of quantum information transfers. One can see the Razor at work in this, almost doing away with time. I hear they are now working with 3D Plank-space that is timeless. Negative 4D spacetime sounds like superstring theory to me - far too much brane for me.
On Apr 14, 10:58 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Once again. > My opinion about SRT. > 1. > One of Einstein's postulate says that quantum of light moves > in a straight line with constant speed c=1 in the vacuum. > 2. > The other Einstein's SRT postulate says that even the speed > of quantum of light is relative. > 3. > It means that quantum of light can change its constant speed. > =. > The book: Albert Einstein and the Cosmic World Order. > / Six lectures delivered at the University > of Michigan in the Spring of 1962 / > by Cornelius Lanczos / The lecture No. 3 / > =============. > Cornelius Lanczos (served as assistant to Einstein during > the period 1928-29 ) wrote: > SRT was created on two postulates. > First postulate - there isn't absolute speed of movement. > Every movement is relative. > Second postulate - the speed of light ( quantum of light) > is constant.Lanczos wrote: from the first point of viewit seems that > > to unite these two different postulates is impossible, > trying to do this is absolute nonsense. (!) > But . . . . It was be done. (!) > Einstein made it. (!) > . . It was needed the Einstein's courage to do this unity. (!) > How did Einstein connected them ? (!) > He solved this problem saying that Newton's absolute space > and time are relative. > And they can be united in negative spacetime - 4D. > ==. > Very well ! ! > There is only small problem in this conception: > What is the negative 4D spacetime ? > Nobody knows. ( ! ) > ===. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
