A vacuum that produces an electron, or anything else, is not a vacuum at all.
Craig Weinberg A vacuum that produces an electron in local area is not more a vacuum at all. socratus ==. On Apr 29, 5:09 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that vacuum comes from the electron instead. An electron is > nothing but a measure of matter's sense of matter. QED approaches > matter from the outside in - which works, to a point, but ultimately > doesn't make sense. A vacuum that produces an electron, or anything > else, is not a vacuum at all. > > On Apr 29, 9:37 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Where did the electron come from ? > > From vacuum of course > > Why? > > Because according to QED electron disappears > > in vacuum having infinite parameters. And because > > “ The law of conservation and transformation > > energy/mass” doesn’t give him to die there – > > he must appear again according to " a method > > of renormalization " and the law of ‘reincarnation’ > > ==. > > socratus- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
