Quite interesting, that information is (as a postulate or hypothesis?) never lost but stored in some form in the black box (hole). Thus, we should manufacture a computer or turing M that could retrieved information from the black hole and present as (live) historical matter. Implies that time could be rolled back to minus infinity. Mike Atovigba
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:47 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Today's Topic Summary > > Group: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics > > - Where does the information come > from?<https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#13688c45d11fa6a6_group_thread_0>[4 > Updates] > > Where does the information come > from?<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/395ebeb96daacbb6> > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Apr 06 06:28AM -0700 > > ‘ The laws of physics dictate that information, like energy, > cannot be destroyed, which means it must go somewhere. > Where did the information go? ’ > / Book ‘ The big questions’ by Michael Brooks. > Page 195-196. / > 1. > Modern biologists speak of information – in genetics. > ( a set of chromosomes contains in its genes the information ) > The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell > is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes. > Question: > How many cells – volumes can a single man have and > how they can create a child during 9 months if according > to the probability theory it is impossible? > Question: > Does DNA Know Geometry ? > 2. > When a radium atom decays, old electro - information is lost, > and the new information is not equivalent to the old. > It seems as if the elementary event in physics presupposes > not the conservation of information but its change. > Question: > What does law of transformation mean according to > the single quanta of information- electron? > 3. > Black hole information paradox . . . > It suggests that physical information could permanently > disappear in a black hole, . . . . . > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox > > =========== . . > > > > > awori achoka <[email protected]> Apr 06 05:56PM +0300 > > If information is preserved in Black Hole, then it rhetorically implies > that, we live in world of multi universes...do not ask me for > proof...am > not a physicist. > On Apr 6, 2012 4:28 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > awori achoka <[email protected]> Apr 06 06:00PM +0300 > > > If information is preserved in a "Black Hole", then it rhetorically > implies that, we live in a world of multi universes...do not ask me for > proof. > > > On Apr 6, 2012 4:28 PM, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > >> =========== . . > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Epistemology" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > > > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Apr 06 10:20AM -0700 > > ‘Can energy and information be identified ? ‘ > ask Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker in his book: > The unity of Nature. Page 282. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_von_Weizs%C3%A4cker > > And on the page 290 – 291 he wrote: > ‘ Mass is information.’ > And on the page 292 he wrote: > ‘ Energy is information.’ > =========. > My opinion. > What is information from Quantum’s Theory point of view ? > From Quantum’s Theory point of view ‘information’ must be > some smallest bit / quantum of information. But physicists > in our world ( according to QED ) use only one particle – > electron to transfer information. They don’t use any another > particles ( quark, muon, meson, tau, . . . etc ) > Therefore I say: ‘ The smallest bit / quantum of information > is electron with energy: E=h*f. ‘ > ===. > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group > epistemology. > You can post via email <[email protected]>. > To unsubscribe from this group, > send<[email protected]>an empty message. > For more options, > visit<http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics>this group. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
