The use of the word 'molecule' in that story is poetic. They could also have said 'bonds of holy matrimony'. As far as I can tell all measurements of photons are by inference within material mediums (Rubidium atoms in this case) and the measuring instrument, which is made of matter also. That the conditions being created in the atomic medium have an effect which we interpret as double measurements is exciting, but it does not necessarily relate to the creation of matter or the validation of photons as freestanding particles.
On Friday, September 27, 2013 8:05:50 AM UTC-4, Awori wrote: > > In view of the above findings and our earlier discussions...could light be > the original source of life forming molecules....? > On Sep 27, 2013 2:54 PM, "awori achoka" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> What do you make of this? >> >> http://m.phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists-never-before-seen.html >> On Aug 4, 2013 2:59 AM, "sadovnik socratus" >> <[email protected]<javascript:>> >> wrote: >> >>> Reference frames and Existence.****** >>> >>> ===…**** >>> >>> There are many pretty solid theories.**** >>> >>> How can be known which theory is wrong and which theory is true ? * >>> *** >>> >>> The answer depends on which reference frame the theory is based. **** >>> >>> The conception of reference frame is the key to know if the theory is >>> true one.**** >>> >>> # **** >>> >>> We know many different reference frames**** >>> >>> ( free, open, closed , 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 11D, . . . MD . . . . )**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Existence cannot begin from a complex system.**** >>> >>> In the beginning must be a simple model. **** >>> >>> Therefore, I will take a two dimensions space as the simplest model.*** >>> * >>> >>> But there are two kinds of two dimensions: the Euclidean ( 2D) space >>> **** >>> >>> and Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D space.**** >>> >>> What is possible to say about these systems ?**** >>> >>> Which reference frame can be taken as a basis of Existence ?**** >>> >>> #**** >>> >>> Euclidean ( 2D) reference frame belongs to a gravity space **** >>> >>> where space and time are two different substances. **** >>> >>> Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D has no gravity **** >>> >>> and space and time are one and the same unite continuum.**** >>> >>> #**** >>> >>> Later Descartes changed Euclidean two dimensions into three **** >>> >>> dimensions . Living in this Descartes system of coordinate**** >>> >>> we try to understand : where did our existence come from ?**** >>> >>> Then, in my opinion, it is logically to take Minkowski negative **** >>> >>> Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D ( without gravity ) as the simplest model**** >>> >>> to have the searching answer. **** >>> >>> ============….**** >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Epistemology" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> >>> . >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
