Popper was into it in a theory of probability.  Vast literature ranges 
across even to godswank.  Summary here with a fair bibliography 
-http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-consciousness/ 

On Friday, 29 November 2013 07:45:09 UTC, Awori wrote:
>
> Has anybody ever authored a book or paper on the philosophy of quantum 
> behaviour? 
> On Nov 28, 2013 1:43 PM, "socratus sadovnik" <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>>       Quantum Evolution:  How  Physics . . .
>>>
>>> / by  Johnjoe McFadden  /
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> *http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Evolution-Weirdest-Explains-Paperback/product-reviews/0393323102/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?showViewpoints=1*<http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Evolution-Weirdest-Explains-Paperback/product-reviews/0393323102/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?showViewpoints=1>
>>>
>>> #
>>>
>>> *Customer Review*
>>>
>>> #
>>>
>>> You've probably noticed that there is a growing flood of books that 
>>> purport to explore the interface between the spooky scientific world of 
>>> quantum physics and a range of other aspects of existence?
>>>
>>> . . . .
>>>
>>> Many in the sciences don't seem to know what to do with the quantum 
>>> world. The physicists seem to wobble in their ability to create rich models 
>>> at any level above that of the quantum phenomena themselves - perhaps 
>>> because theirs can be a sparse world... the vast emptiness beyond the 
>>> quark. They are often only comfortable "wrapping" the ultimately 
>>> incomprehensible realities of the quantum world in merely mathematical or 
>>> semantic models.
>>>
>>> By  Daryl Anderson 
>>>
>>> #
>>>
>>> Overall the first part of the book is great in understanding that a 
>>> paradigm shift must be made if the evolutionary hypothesis is to remain 
>>> salient. If these shifts are not adopted we may see the Darwinian 
>>> evolutionist go down in history as ideological frauds much like the 
>>> flat-earthers. The second part of the book is lacking due to a 
>>> misunderstanding of Quantum Mechanics and trying to force science to fit a 
>>> philosophical ideology.
>>>
>>>  By Enigma "Cheers"" 
>>>
>>> ===…
>>>
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Epistemology" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to