Stefan Eilemann wrote: > > Minor note: Imo the 'object table' should be one member of your > config, instead of a singleton. >
Yeah, this is the behaviour I'm moving back to. Initially I used a singleton class for the global state to make things easier to follow but now that I understand the equalizer workings more in depth, I've been moving them back to the subclasses. I don't get the destructor warnings when using the objects ala eqPly so I'll move them back. Stefan Eilemann wrote: > > So presumably this is frame-specific dynamic data you want to keep > once per pipe - then you might also want to relax frame > synchronization so that pipe threads are not node-synchronized. The PG > explains this. > Yes, I am doing this. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/properly-detaching-eq%3A%3Anet%3A%3AObjects-from-the-session-tp1371200p1371378.html Sent from the Equalizer - Parallel Rendering mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ eq-dev mailing list [email protected] https://in-zueri.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eq-dev http://www.equalizergraphics.com
