While we are all loving each other I feel obliged to say that the focus of this call to action was (I believe) helping p2 *ship in 3.4* with a reasonable function level. To that end it would be really useful to distinguish between participation aimed at 3.4 and futures participation. Futures stuff is very welcomed but needs to be called out as such so as to not distract from the 3.4 goal.
For context, p2 needs to be function complete in 2 weeks (M7). After that it is locking down code, fixing lingering bugs, improving robustness etc. Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:equinox-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Lewis > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 6:55 PM > To: Equinox development mailing list > Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Participation opportunity > > Hi Thomas, > > Thomas Hallgren wrote: > > Susan Franklin McCourt wrote: > >> > >> I could imagine the day when > >> > >> - update sites, CVS repos, etc. are all using ECF > >> > > And while we're at it, let's not forget Subversion. Just think about > > it. An EPL licensed SVN-client based on ECF. That certainly gives me > > that warm and fuzzy feeling :-) > > > Thomas your 'I <heart> ECF' t-shirt is in the mail ;-). > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > equinox-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
