I have removed the email addresses. It didn't even occur to me to protect these since they are easily available in bugzilla (which is where I got them from). However, anything to reduce the chance of spambots harvesting our emails is a good thing.
Aren't the CQ numbers the same as the IPzilla numbers that are listed there? I actually just copied this table from the various graduation review logs - they haven't been updated since the graduation reviews. John "Jeff McAffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2008 10:49 PM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list <[email protected]> To "'Equinox development mailing list'" <[email protected]> cc Subject RE: [equinox-dev] Equinox IP log Thanks John, this is a good start. I wonder if there is something we can harvest from the Orbit IP log structure. DJ? Thoughts? It would be generally useful to have the CQ numbers associated with the third party code. One important not is that I believe we have a policy about protecting email addresses. We went through this in Orbit where the decision was to not include them. DJ, do you recall anything about this? Either way, unless there is a compelling reason to include them they should be removed. Jeff From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Arthorne Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 4:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [equinox-dev] Equinox IP log FYI, I have committed an initial Equinox IP log: http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/documents/iplogs/EquinoxIPlog.html We had initially started with a separate IP log per component, but as I started to update them I found it painful to track the committer lists separately so I combined them. Also there is only one IP log URL that can be linked from http://eclipse.org/projects/listofprojects.php. The third party software list is not yet complete, and I have not processed all the p2 contributions since p2 graduation. Can all committers quickly scan the committer list and ensure they are listed, and their login, organization, and email addresses are correct? I believe we only need to record committers who contributed to the 3.4 release - this excludes people who committed only to the incubator project, and those who only committed prior to the 3.3 release (someone please correct me if this is wrong). _______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
