(Moved discussion from bug to Equinox mailing list)

>> As for the other comments, is introducing this as a new default method on
>> IProgressMonitor and coordinating a release with fixes upstream possible? Or
>> will that never allowed?
> Following the rules as they are now that would require a major version
> increase.  Not something I think is justified to fix this issue.

What are the general plans here? I'd like to see the specific issue fixed in a 
good way. Having the new default method on IProgressMonitor seems like a clean 
approach. However, I tend to agree that this is a big change (in terms of 

Are there any plans to have another major version? What are the main concerns 
in that area?

equinox-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit

Reply via email to