----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
I can only agree to you John. Hartmut ----- Original Message ----- From: "Skyport Services" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Coupe-Tech" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 8:55 AM Subject: RE: FW: WRB Re: [COUPERS-TECH] D and CD model history > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > At 10:51 AM 3/4/2005, Wood, Percy wrote: > >As I tried to explain in my review of "Stick and Rudder," the pedals are not > >needed. > > Ah, Percy, isn't that circular logic? Agreed, if the plane can't spin then > pedals are unnecessary. From www.ercoupe.org "Combined with a somewhat > limited elevator up travel (on some models), a Coupe's tail can't be pushed > down enough to stall or keep stalled the majority of the wing on any > Coupe." Allow the up-elevator travel to exceed the safe limits and "all > bets are off" just as they are over gross or aft CG. My point was simply > that the CAA weenie had to develop some standard by which it could be > ensured that the plane would in fact remain unstallable and > unspinable. The penalty for an error is finding yourself in a spin with no > hope of recovery. > > John Cooper > Skyport Services > PO Box 249 > 4996 Delaware Tnpk > Rensselaerville, NY 12147 > 518 797-3064 > > ========================================================================== == == > To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/ > > > > ========================================================================== ==== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
