----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any 
advice in this forum.]----


My IA / A&P signs off his own work.
Never ever's been an issue.
Eliacim

>
> I sign off my own work and have for years.
> Let's ask the  group.
> Bill
>
>    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] TSO'd vs Non TSO'd instruments: another view
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:16:31 -0500
>
>   Bill, the IA I use says he cannot sign off on his own work.  Is he
> trying to give  an AP work or maybe just uninformed?  He  has been an IA
> for 20 yrs. Lee B   On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:52:24 -0600 "WILLIAM BIGGS"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Absolutly.
> I was confused by John's comment "IA's can only inspect, they can't do any
> actual work..."
> I suspect he got tong-tied. As much as I hate it I have to work and
> inspect. And yes, strange as it seems, I can write off my own work.
> Bill
>
>      From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To:  [email protected]
> Subject:  RE: [COUPERS-TECH] TSO'd vs Non TSO'd instruments: another view
> Date:  Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:13:22 -0600 (MDT)
>>----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
>> advice in this forum.]----
>>
>>
>>John and all,
>>
>>I'm not trying to flame you here, but your information is not correct.
>>
>>An IA not only can, but in many cases, must perform the work. Also, an
>>I.A. must hold an A&P since eligibilty for becoming an IA requires
>> that:
>>
>>"The applicant must hold a current mechanic's
>>certificate, with airframe and powerplant ratings, that has
>>been in effect for at least three years. The applicant  must
>>have been actively engaged in maintaining certificated
>>aircraft for at least the two-year period before applying."
>>
>>
>>"PRIVILEGES OF AN IA.
>>A. When exercising the privileges of an IA, the holder
>>may:
>>• Inspect and approve for return to service major
>>repairs and major alterations, if the work was done
>>according to technical data approved by the
>>Administrator
>>• Perform an annual inspection
>>• Perform or supervise a progressive inspection"
>>
>>(This is all straight out of 8300.10 CHG 12 Chapter 26 & 27.)
>>
>>Just thought this needed to be cleared up.
>>
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
>> any
>> > advice in this forum.]----
>> >
>> >
>>  >> My understanding is that work on a non structural panel, such as
>> >> installing radios, requires only a log book entry and recording of
>> the
>> >> new weight and balance data by an AI.
>> >
>> > If there's no 337 involved, an IA is not necessary.  (In fact,
>> technically
>> > an IA cannot sign it off.  An A&P is required.  Since most if not
>> all IA's
>> > are also A&P's, it's pretty much a semantic issue, but the signer
>> must
>> > sign
>> > it off as an A&P.)  IA's can only inspect, they can't do any
>> actual
>> > work...
>> > ;)
>> >
>> > John Cooper, A&P
>> >
>> > Skyport Services
>> >
>> > PO Box 249
>> >
>> > 4996 Delaware Tnpk
>> >
>> > Rensselaerville, NY  12147
>> >
>> > 518 797-3064
>> >
>> > Fax 518 797-3865
>> >
>> > www.skyportservices.net
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Dan Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 7:29 AM
>> >> To: Ctech
>> >> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] TSO'd vs Non TSO'd instruments: another
>> view
>> >>
>> >> ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
>> >> any
>> >> advice in this forum.]----
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I think some of the confusion may be between the work that the
>> aircraft
>> >> owner can do as preventative maintenance, the work that an AI can
>> sign
>> >> off with a log book entry as a minor change, and the major work  that
>> >> requires a 337 or FAA field approval.  This is a seperate issue from
>> the
>> >> TSO vs non TSO'd instruments.
>> >>
>> >> My understanding is that work on a non structural panel, such as
>> >> installing radios, requires only a log book entry and recording of
>> the
>> >> new weight and balance data by an AI.
>> >>
>> >> Dan Brown
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> John Roach wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before
>> following
>> >> > any advice in this forum.]----
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Lynn.
>> >> > Another view of the TSO puzzle from Bill Biggs. See below
>> >> >
>> >> > John Roach
>> >> > N  2427H
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >  RE: [COUPERS-TECH] Answers Re: TSO/Non-TSO
>> >> >
>> >> > WILLIAM BIGGS
>> >> > Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:08:23 -0800
>> >> >
>> >> > "5)  You may not even need a 337.  Those forms address the
>> >> > installation process, NOT the radio itself, and are only needed at
>> all
>> >> > IF the installation involves a "major structural change."  Putting
>> the
>> >> > radio into an existing hole, or hanging it beneath the panel does
>> NOT
>> >> > need a 337.  Similarly, if you're putting a new antenna into an
>> >> > existing antenna mount location, its not a "major structural
>> change,"
>> >> > therefore no 337 needed. "
>>  >> >
>> >> > Not true. Example: If you change from your cessna radio to a
>> Michael.
>> >> > It goes in exactly the same location but we all know they require a
>> >> > 337. Hanging an additional radio beneath the panel constitutes a
>> >> > change in weight and ballance however small and must be recorded.
>> >> >
>> >> > 337s now require a provision for "continued airworthiness."
>> Anything
>> >> > that is not in the airframe or engine specifications that is added
>> or
>> >> > changed constitutes a major alteration unless specifically excluded
>> in
>> >> > part 43.1.
>> >> >
>> >> > The following is considered preventative maint and is allowed but
>> only
>> >> > of the EXACT type:
>> >> >
>> >>  > (31) Removing and replacing self-contained, front instrument
>> >> > panel-mounted navigation and communication devices that employ
>> >> > tray-mounted connectors that connect the unit when the unit is
>> >> > installed into the instrument panel, (excluding automatic flight
>> >> > control systems, transponders, and microwave frequency distance
>> >> > measuring equipment (DME)). The approved unit must be
>> >> > designed to be readily and repeatedly removed and replaced, and
>> >> > pertinent instructions must be provided. Prior to the unit's
>> intended
>> >> > use, and operational check must be performed in accordance with the
>> >> > applicable sections of part 91 of this chapter.
>> >> > (32) Updating self-contained, front instrument  panel-mounted Air
>> >> > Traffic Control (ATC) navigational software data bases (excluding
>> >> > those of automatic flight control systems, transponders, and
>> microwave
>> >> > frequency distance measuring equipment (DME)) provided no
>> disassembly
>> >> > of the unit is required and pertinent instructions are provided.
>> Prior
>> >> > to the unit's intended use, an operational check must be performed
>> in
>> >> > accordance with applicable sections of part 91 of this chapter.
>> >> >
>> >> > Appendix A
>> >> >
>> >> > Sec. A43.1
>> >> >
>> >> > (a) /Major alterations/--
>> >> > (1) /Airframe major alterations./ Alterations of the following
>> parts
>> >> > and alterations of the following types, _when  not listed in the
>> >> > aircraft specifications issued by the FAA_, are airframe major
>> >> > alterations:
>> >> >
>> >> > Bill
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before
>> following
>> >> >> any advice in this forum.]----
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   Hey Gang: Some time ago we had a discussion about TSO'd and non
>> >> >> TSO'd instrument requirements. As I remember, one of our group
>> came
>> >> >> up with the FAA paragraph's that specifically spelled out the use
>> of
>> >> >> those items. I saved the message, but unfortunately for  me, my
>> >> >> computer bombed last fall, and I lost all of the saved messages
>> >> >> before then.
>> >> >>     I have reviewed most of last years Tech messages, and did not
>> >> >> find what I was looking for. Does anyone have the answer? I know
>> >> >> there was considerable discussion about radios. but I am
>> specifically
>> >> >> concerned about instruments.
>> >> >> Lynn
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> -
>> >> >> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's
>> >> >> free from AOL at *AOL.com*
>> >> >>  .
>> >> >>
>> >> ==========================================================================
>> >> ====
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> ==========================================================================
>> >> ====
>> >> >
>> >> > To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  
>> >> ==========================================================================
>> >> ====
>> >> To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ==============================================================================
>> > To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>==============================================================================
>>To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
>>
>>
>>
>
>


==============================================================================
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm



Reply via email to