Bart.
Lengthily post.

I may not understand all of it.

My first thought was that a spin close to the ground is very unlikely to 
develop. You will hit ground first.
That's the way you should land anyway. May be not that harsh of a stall, but 
close to it when landing.

Brings me to the second thought. When you are able to hold the nose wheel off 
the runway for quite some distance  - in a Coupe, you are simply landing too 
fast. But good advice to air break rather than Goodyear-puck brake the plane.

The part about the trim tab influencing landing or stall characteristics is not 
really clear to me. 
To me the trim tab is mainly used to keep the elevator in a certain angle, 
resulting in a certain altitude per power setting.

The trim tab is small enough not to represent another flying surface. I did 
quite a few stalls in my coupe and can say that it makes no difference how you 
trim the plane. You'll end up full elevator up in any case for the stall. 

In case you are trying to stall the plane by lets say slowing down to below 
flying speed at a certain altitude, you won't end in a stall, your Ercoupe 
simply would not hold the altitude and start sinking like a brick. A good 
steerable brick though.

As for the spins, The Ercoupe is characteristically incapable of spinning. That 
is proofed in a wind tunnel test with a model. Even when intestinally put in a 
spin, the model would just get out of the spin by itself. 
see also:
http://www.ercoupe.info/index.php/Main/WindCanalTest

Hartmut




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: robertbartunek 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 4:24 PM
  Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Stall/spin potential-danger


  At Sun-n-Fun, I watched the C-54 land and the guy held the nose wheel 
  off the runway for quite some distance down the runway. Reminded me 
  what we used to to to aerobrake airplanes in the Air Force and how we 
  used to enhance elevator effectiveness to hold the nose up longer on 
  landing rollout and induce a lot of aerodynamic drag. Saves the 
  brakes, you know.
  The caveat is that there may be a way to get a higher angle of attack 
  and/or full stall in the Ercoupe, if conditions are right, and 
  subsequent autorotation (spin).
  Elevator effectiveness is increased significantly, at least in the 
  C/D with the bigger trim tab, if you trim full nose down. You can try 
  it if you don't believe it on landing rollout if there is no 
  crosswind (need that nosewheel on the ground to steer). You can hold 
  the nose wheel off the runway significantly longer with full nose 
  down trim than you can if the airplane is trimmed for landing.
  The dynamics are, with full nose down trim, the elevator trim tab 
  moves upward, increasing the effectiveness of the up elevator input. 
  The danger is, if you are trimmed full nose down and practicing 
  stalls, you might exceed the design certification test parameters, 
  get a full stall and departure and end up in a spin and become a test 
  pilot.
  Now, before some jump on me saying the above fearing that someone 
  might go out and try it, I am doing it as a matter of promoting 
  flying safety because there may be a way to spin an Ercoupe and 
  everyone should be aware of the possibility. 
  I'm not saying to do it, the same as I am not saying to push the yoke 
  full forward and add full power to see how fast you can go before 
  the wings diverge and come off, or to put a gun to your head and 
  squeeze the trigger to see what happens. I am just issuing a warning 
  that there might be a subtle booby-trap that can possibly get you in 
  trouble.
  Bart



   

Reply via email to