I've received many helpful replies to my "legitimate charges?" query,  
both on-list and off-list -- thank you all!   Most helpfully, some  
explained enough about magneto problems happening &/or being  
detectable (or not) to give me some clues on how my 'Coupe's  
immediate-post-annual mag problems could have come about.

There was enough variation in one area of the replies that I'd like  
to invite more comment on it:  some seem to feel that an Annual is  
just a "safety check," mainly reviewing ADs and for corrosion, some  
that it is a"safety check" of all systems and parts and anything that  
could break/leak/fail/etc., and some seemed to consider it in  
addition also a maintenance marathon , including *servicing*  
everything like a 100-hr. check-up & tune-up & fluids/lubes &  
preventative maintenance.  Is there a consensus within the industry  
on the scope of what it means to "Annual" the plane?  This is very  
interesting since many mechanics seem to offer a flat-fee "Annual" or  
have a set # of hours that it takes them to "do an Annual," and there  
seems to be is a wide range of what that is.

I am not asking folks to address the absolute $-cost (it's clear  
there's a wide variation among even those of us on the list), but  
rather the scope and "philosophy" of the Annual:  "safety check,"  
"safety+maintenance," or ______?

Thank you all for sharing the benefit of your experience and for the  
education you're giving me!

Linda

Reply via email to